![]() ![]() But once these territories had been returned to their native peoples, the U.S. In the nineteenth century, it colonized Cuba and the Philippines, in keeping with the Western approach of the time. Among all these former colonizers, the United States occupies a place right at the top. Russia, on the other hand, colonized its inland regions in Central Asia but never ventured south. And it is true that every country actively supporting Ukraine was once a colonizing power. Refusing to support Ukraine is one way to make Europe pay for its past acts of exploitation and slavery. The global North colonized all these nations at some stage in their histories-and decolonization has failed to remove an unconfessed desire for revenge. One answer is that the global South is driven by an even stronger sentiment of bitterness and resentment. How can we explain such widespread dissidence? After all, any keen observer can see that the war in Ukraine is above all a battle between democracy and despotism. In fact, the South-now known as the global South-is refusing to get involved, totally contradicting its own principles of national independence and inviolable borders. But surely one democracy should support another? The same question could be asked of Brazil, South Africa, and India, all of which have either voiced support for Russia or declared neutrality in what they describe as a Western conflict. Unsurprisingly, the Russians have accepted it wholeheartedly, as the proposed measures are entirely in their favor and to the detriment of the Ukrainians. Indonesia, the world’s only democratic Muslim republic, has just presented its plan for peace in Ukraine. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |